When using Go and common, which package is suggested for configuring the formatter for Logrus?

The common's logutil package is suggested for configuring the formatter for Logrus because it is specifically designed to facilitate logging functionalities within the Go ecosystem while leveraging Logrus's powerful logging features. This package typically includes pre-defined configuration options, making it easier for developers to set up and customize their logging without diving deep into the Logrus library's intricacies.

Using the common's logutil package not only streamlines logging configuration but also ensures consistency across various projects or components that may utilize logging functionalities. It serves as a wrapper that provides a more user-friendly interface for configuring log formats, log levels, and other logging behaviors, which enhances both readability and maintainability of the code.

In contrast, the other choices may not provide the same level of ease or direct integration with Logrus. For instance, while the logutil package from Logrus might seem like a viable option, it does not have the same level of abstraction or configurability that the common's logutil package offers. Similarly, GoLogger and LoggerConfig do not align directly with Logrus's recommended practices or integrations, which are essential for ensuring reliable logging implementations in Go applications.